Wednesday , 16 October 2019
Breaking News

NEW DELHI: Five days after retiring as Chief of the Army Staff, Gen V K Singh today affirmed his belief in civilian supremacy over the military "rooted in justice and fairness", and said any violation of this "must be resisted".

Civilian supremacy must be just; otherwise resist it: V K Singh

NEW DELHI: Five days after retiring as Chief of the Army Staff, Gen V K Singh today affirmed his belief in civilian supremacy over the military "rooted in justice and fairness", and said any violation of this "must be resisted".

Civilian supremacy must always be rooted in the fundamental principles of justice, merit and fairness, he said, adding that any violation of this must be resisted "if we are to protect the institutional integrity of our armed forces".
Reminded that the ethos of the armed forces was to obey orders of superiors, the former Chief said that the ethos was to obey "correct" orders. "If the order is wrong, stand up and say that the order is wrong".
In his first interview since retiring on May 31, Gen Singh acknowledged that his last months in office were controversial and "eventful".
But all the controversies were "manufactured" and there were "all sorts of allegations, from implied coups to communal nonsense", he said.
He cited two media reports in this regard, one hinting at an implied coup because of troop movements towards Delhi in January and the leakage of his letter to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh complaining about lack of defence preparedness.
"The coup story was the most bizarre thing" that happened during his tenure of 26 months, he said, adding that there was no such thing as "unauthorised troop movement" in the army. That the leak of the letter was "motivated and aimed at discrediting me, is now quite obvious", he said. The enquiry into the leak must not be "covered up" and the person behind it should be "nailed" because its amounts to treason, the former chief said.
Asked if he had any regrets about the way he had handled issues during his tenure as Army Chief, Singh replied, "none".
"No regrets at all, no regrets, no rancour, no feeling of dismay, nothing. You have to take things as they come", he asserted.
"I have done my job as honestly and sincerely as I could. It is not for me to pass judgement on my tenure. However, as an individual I am at ease with myself".
Describing his equation with Defence Minister A K Antony as "extremely good", Singh said the working relationship between the Ministry of Defence and the Army Headquarters was never an issue with "all lines of communication being wide open".
He strongly defended his decision to take the issue of his date of birth to the Supreme Court, saying, "I fought this injustice with all options that I had available to me within the constraints of the service and as a citizen of India".
Asked why he had accepted his promotion to the post of a Corps Commander on the basis of his year of birth being 1950, and not 1951 as claimed by him, the former chief said that this was a misunderstanding in the minds of the people. Promotions in the army are not based on date of birth but on seniority fixed in the Indian Military Academy and based on merit.
Three years of remaining service was required for the post of Corps Commander and he had that on the basis of his date of birth in either 1950 or 1951.  He said the issue of his age was raked up in 2006 and "frankly at first I had no clue to suggest it was a motivated attempt to tamper with my records".
 

Check Also

Narayan Rane’s MSP merges with BJP

Sindhudurg (Maharashtra): In a snub to the Shiv Sena, Chief Minister Devendra  Fadnavis presided over …