Supreme Court recognises transgenders as third gender

0
4
NEW DELHI: In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court on Tuesday granted legal recognition to transgenders or eunuchs as third category of gender and directed the Centre and all states to treat them as socially and educationally backward classes to extend reservation in admission in educational institutions and for public appointments.

Paving the way to bring the transgender in national mainstream, the apex court directed governments to take steps to remove problems faced by them such as fear, shame, social pressure, depression and social stigma.
A bench of Justice K S Radhakrishnan and Justice A K Sikri held that discrimination faced by transgenders, also known as Hijras, eunuchs, Kothis, Aravanis, Jogappas, Shiv-Shakthis etc, is “unimaginable” and their rights have to be protected as they are citizens of the country and having all rights under the Constitution like the male or the female have.
“Discrimination faced by this group in our society is rather unimaginable and their rights have to be protected, irrespective of chromosomal sex, genitals, assigned birth sex or implied gender role,” it said.
“We, therefore, declare Hijras, eunuchs, apart from binary gender, be treated as third gender for the purpose of safeguarding their rights under Part III of our Constitution and the laws made by the Parliament and the State Legislature,” it said. The bench said that mindset of the society towards the transgender has to be changed and it is time for court to recognise their rights and to extend and interpret the Constitution to ensure a dignified life of transgender people.
“Seldom, our society realises or cares to realise the trauma, agony and pain which the members of transgender community undergo, nor appreciates the innate feelings of the members of the transgender community, especially of those whose mind and body disown their biological sex. Our society often ridicules and abuses the transgender community and in public places like railway stations, bus stands, schools, workplaces, malls, theatres, hospitals, they are sidelined and treated as untouchables, forgetting the fact that the moral failure lies in the society’s unwillingness to contain or embrace different gender identities and expressions, a mindset which we have to change,” the court said.
Transgender or Hijras are not men by virtue of anatomy appearance and psychologically, they are also not women, though they are like women with no female reproduction organ and no menstruation, the court noted.
Referring to various religious text, it said that historically, transgenders (TGs) played a prominent role but with the onset of colonial rule the situation changed “drastically” with the British virtually declaring them as criminals.
“Unfortunately, we have no legislation in this country dealing with the rights of transgender community. Due to the absence of suitable legislation protecting the rights of the members of the transgender community, they are facing discrimination in various areas and hence the necessity to follow the International Conventions to which India is a party and to give due respect to other non-binding International Conventions and principles,” it said.
The bench also said that there are many countries including Nepal and Pakistan where the rights of transgenders are recognised and are being protected by state authorities.
“Non-recognition of the identity of Hijras/transgender persons denies them equal protection of law, thereby leaving them extremely vulnerable to harassment, violence and sexual assault in public spaces, at home and in jail, also by the police. Sexual assault, including molestation, rape, forced anal and oral sex, gang rape and stripping is being committed with impunity and there are reliable statistics and material to support such activities,” it said.
It also said social justice does not mean equality before law in papers but to translate the spirit of the Constitution into action.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here